Set Aside & Decertify! AZ's Mark Finchem introduces resolution to decertify 3 2020 AZ county elections

Arizona State Representative Mark Finchem introduced a resolution to set aside and decertify the Nov 2020 election results in three Arizona counties.

 

The resolution, HCR 2033 (HERE) calls on Maricopa, Pima and Yuma counties to set aside their election results "based on clear and convincing evidence that the elections in those counties were irredeemably compromised".

 

One bit of evidence among the whereas clauses on pages 1 and 2 of the resolution reads as follows (emphasis mine):

"Whereas, the Arizona Election Code requires that all persons voting in an election must be registered to vote twenty-nine days before an election by law, and voter registration was extended by the federal judiciary to October 23 in direct conflict with A.R.S. section 16-101,1 subsection A, paragraph 3, a violation of the separation of powers;"

and ironically coincides EXACTLY what Arizona's Rep. Andy Biggs asked the entire U.S. House of Representatives to consider during his January 6, 2021 objections to Arizona electoral votes at the 23:49 minute mark of this CSPAN video.

 

"Arizona also establishes deadlines for voter registration. The deadline has been in place for 30 years."

 

"THIS year the voter registration deadline was October 5. Early voting commenced two days later."

"Five days before the deadline, a group filed a lawsuit demanding that an Arizona election officials does not have to enforce the deadline."

 

"The Federal District court said that other states have a deadline later than Arizona and some allow for registration and that Arizona's new deadline would be the time HE chose, not the legislators."

"The appellate court noted that the Arizona deadline established by the state legislature was sound and appropriate and compiled with the Constitution. But the appellate court merely shortened the extension, bypassing of the deadline to 10 days. The appellate court, without legal justification, also decided that everyone who registered after the legal deadline, but before the deadline created by judicial fiat could still vote."

 

Bottom line: in a violation of separation of powers the judiciary unilaterally changed a voter registration law aka deadline that had been in place for THIRTY years.

 

Mark Finchem's resolution summarizes this and other justifications that give complete legitimacy to Biggs' objection cited above.  

County Examiner recently reported on the reemergence of a January 4, 2021 letter sent to all Republican members of Congress from the Senate of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania also asking to support objections to the electoral college votes and delay certification of the November 2020 election results.

 

 

 

 

 

Georgia: hearing scheduled to get rid of unsigned, sketchy DNC agreement for Senate run-off

Georgians learned an unsigned and therefore invalid, sketchy pinky-shake, backroom deal between Swampy DNC lawyers and equally swampy Georgia Republicans affected the outcome of the Presidential election and now they don't want it used to affect the January 5th US Senate ruun-offs.

Yesterday County Examiner opined it was about time that a coalition of Republicans filed suit against the Georgia Secretary of State to block use of an unsigned consent decree that destroyed election integrity in the 2020 general election.

The suit was filed in Federal court (Case 1:20-cv-05018-ELR) here by the Georgia Republican Party, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Perdue for Senate and Georgians for Kelly Loeffler and against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and members of the Georgia State Elections Board.

They've finally followed the lead of renowned defamation attorney and fellow Georgian Lin Wood in challenging the agreement that changed the rules for signature verification used in the 2020 election.

A hearing will be held tomorrow December 17. 

It's about time! Georgia Republicans sue their own GOP SOS to get rid of sketchy, unsigned DNC consent decree

It's about time! A coalition of Republicans filed suit against the Georgia Secretary of State to block use of an unsigned consent decree that destroyed election integrity in the 2020 general election.

The suit was filed in Federal court (Case 1:20-cv-05018-ELR) here by the Georgia Republican Party, the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Perdue for Senate and Georgians for Kelly Loeffler and against Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and members of the Georgia State Elections Board.

They've finally followed the lead of renowned defamation attorney and fellow Georgian Lin Wood in challenging the agreement that changed the rules for signature verification used in the 2020 election.

Once it was learned this agreement was used to affect the outcome of the Presidential election in Georgia they don't want it used to affect the January 5th US Senate run-offs.

Checkmate!

As County Examiner reported recently what makes this swampy settlement agreement so sketchy is the Georgia Republican Attorney General name is on the paperwork along with Hillary Clinton's, DNC, Fusion GPS, phony Steele dossier law firm Perkins Coie.

What else makes this use of this agreement so suspect? 

It was not SIGNED by either party. Shouldn't that invalidate its use?

Georgia: Trump legal team submits "mystery" hard drive as exhibit

Today the Trump legal team submitted a mysterious hard drive as an Exhibit 14 amendment in President Donald J Trump's suit in Georgia Superior Court. 

Tactically you just gotta love that the Swampy Media and their Swampy Lawyers can't comment or object to the contents of that hard drive until after the court hears, sees the contents of the media files. 

Hmmm.

Here we go again! Is it legal? Did Zuckerbucks pay for a ZuckerElection in Phoenix, AZ?

On November 29 County Examiner wrote about a group of Wisconsin voters and taxpayers who filed suit against the Wisconsin Election Commission. Their suit outlined how and exactly which Wisconsin state statutes were violated that allowed their state absentee voter ID laws be ignored in advance of and through Election Day November 3.

Among the documents in that case was one exhibit describing how a 501c3 group associated with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg "gifted" in excess of $6.3 million dollars to conduct the Wisconsin general election in the manner determined by the agreement and not in accordance with state law.

SURPRISE!

Meanwhile over in Arizona, among the documents filed in Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County CV2020-096490 are a two-part amicus brief filed by CTCL (Center for Tech and Civic Life) and the documents Swampy Media and their counterparts Lazy Research Media refuse to publish-

a copy of an October 15, 2020 $2.995 million grant agreement between CTCL and Maricopa County !

CTCL Grant Award AZ by Yvonne Larsen

County Examiner wonders about the funneling of over $2.995 million "ZuckerBucks" through a 501c3 (tax break for doing so??) to provide for the salaries and operating expenses of conducting, in part a Presidential election in the manner the agreement calls for instead of in the manner prescribed by state law.

Didn't the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission provide all the states with federal money through the CARES Act for GOTV?

And I bet like County Examiner you cant WAIT for the Maricopa recorder to provide a report to CTCL explaining how the $2.995 million ZuckerBucks were spent and on what activities?

LOL!

CTCL Amicus 1 by Yvonne Larsen

CTCL Amicus 2 by Yvonne Larsen

Wisconsin: Will Joe Biden and Kamala Harris themselves be named as defendants in Trump, Pence appeal?

Read the briefs. Read the exhibits. Read the affidavits. And now after reading the latest news out of the Trump legal team in Wisconsin, it certainly seems both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris themselves may be named defendants as the Trump campaign legal challenges advance in Wisconsin.

From the December 3 press release:

This afternoon the Trump campaign, at the direction of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, filed “Notices of Appeal” from the presidential recount in both Dane and Milwaukee Counties.

Following established practice, the campaign also formally requested that Wisconsin Supreme Court Patience D. Roggensack “appoint a circuit judge, who shall be a reserve judge if available, to hear the appeal.”

The campaign also requested an expedited schedule for a scheduling conference for the appointed judge to set a schedule for further steps including, but not limited to dates for filing the complaint, filing for an answer, submitting evidence, hearings, and other necessary steps.

“As the Supreme Court directed, we have filed an appeal in Dane and Milwaukee Counties as we work to ensure only legal votes count in Wisconsin. We fully expect to be back in front of the state’s highest court very soon,” said Jim Troupis, Wisconsin counsel for the campaign. “We will continue fighting on behalf of Wisconsinites and the American people to defend their right to a free and fair election.”

Read the Notices of Appeal here. The original complaint can be found here.

Georgia: Swamp creatures nervous as agreement that changed rules for signature verification called into question

Swamp creatures in Washington, DC, the State of Georgia and Texas are in way over their head for lying about Attorney Lin Woods' financial support of the Republican Party. Now is the time for these swamp creatures to come forth and confess they've either failed to read the briefs filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals or they have indeed read the briefs and have willfully ignored its contents.

A review of the public record on file in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in the 20-14418 styled Wood v Raffensperger reveals Wood is a financial supporter of the Republican Party and has legal standing in the case challenging the agreement that changed the rules for signature verification used in the 2020 election.

Further review of the brief explains the reason the settlement agreement should be deemed invalid. Guess what? The agreement was not fully executed, meaning it was not signed by the parties themselves.

Swampy America Last, cheap labor-loving RINOs like Texas Congressman Dan Crenshaw called Lin Wood a grifter. 

If you are not familiar with the Compromise Settlement Agreement read the brief here. 

Consolidated Reply Brief of... by Yvonne Larsen

Wisconsin: Trump campaign files lawsuit to restore election integrity

The suit includes four cases with clear evidence of unlawfulness, such as:

• illegally altering absentee ballot envelopes,
• counting ballots that had no required application,
• overlooking unlawful claims of indefinite confinement, and
• holding illegal voting events called Democracy in the Park

Additionally very specific allegations pertain to directions from the Wisconsin Elections Commission that are contrary to state law. Municipal clerks issued mail ballots to voters circumventing state voter ID laws for such ballots. Furthermore Wisconsin statues allow ONLY a voter to cure a ballot.

The date, time and manner of conducting federal elections is within the purview of the state legislature --  Not a rogue governor via executive order, not a partisan activist hack Secretary of State, not one or a body of black-robed activist judges, not an unsigned consent decree.

From the press release:

President Donald J. Trump’s re-election campaign filed a lawsuit to the Wisconsin Supreme Court following the campaign's requested recount to uncover fraud and abuse that irrefutably altered the outcome of this election. Today's suit includes four cases with clear evidence of unlawfulness, such as illegally altering absentee ballot envelopes, counting ballots that had no required application, overlooking unlawful claims of indefinite confinement, and holding illegal voting events called Democracy in the Park. These unlawful actions affected no less than approximately 221,000 ballots out of over the three million ballots cast in Wisconsin. 

The Wisconsin Elections Commission directed municipal clerks to illegally alter incomplete absentee ballot envelopes contrary to Wisconsin law. Clerks were instructed that they could rely on their own “personal knowledge,” or unspecified “lists or databases at his or her disposal” to add in missing information on returned absentee ballots. Under Wisconsin law, incomplete absentee ballots must be corrected by the voter, and only the voter or they may not be counted.

In another example, municipal clerks issued absentee ballots to voters without requiring the mandatory application, in direct conflict with Wisconsin’s absentee voting safeguards. Wisconsin law expressly requires that absentee ballots may not be issued without receiving a written application requesting the ballot. Despite clear statute, clerks in Madison and Milwaukee issued thousands of absentee ballots without collecting a written application during the two-week in-person absentee voting period that ran from October 20, 2020, through November 1, 2020

Voter identification is an essential requirement in Wisconsin to ensure only eligible voters cast ballots. In Madison and Milwaukee, voters were fraudulently permitted by election officials to circumvent voter ID laws and claim an absentee voting status that is only to be used for voters who are indefinitely confined under the circumstances that they are physically ill, infirm, elderly, or disabled. More than 20,000 voters claimed that status and received and returned ballots without providing proper identification and without meeting the requirements for that status, and those ballots should not be counted in accordance with Wisconsin statute. 

Finally, the city of Madison created unlawful polling locations at over 200 parks and city locations through their Democracy in the Park voting events. These voting events were held outside of the county’s approved polling locations and did not follow the state’s strict absentee voting requirements. Not only did they not follow the law, but Joe Biden’s campaign encouraged this unlawful voting, advertising these events as opportunities to vote and telling voters to bring their completed ballot to turn in or their incomplete ballot to have a so-called “poll worker” serve as a witness. Voters are not allowed to turn in their absentee ballots anywhere other than the designated polling locations, and any ballots illegally cast there should not be counted.

“The people of Wisconsin deserve election processes with uniform enforcement of the law, plain and simple. During the recount in Dane and Milwaukee counties, we know with absolute certainty illegal ballots have unduly influenced the state's election results. Wisconsin cannot allow the over three million legal ballots to be eroded by even a single illegal ballot,” said Jim Troupis, counsel to the campaign. “We will continue fighting on behalf of the American people to defend their right to a free and fair election by helping to restore integrity and transparency in our elections.”

"As we have said from the very beginning of this process, we want all legal votes and only legal votes to be counted," said Rudy Giuliani, former New York City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump. "Americans must be able to trust in our election results, and we not stop until we can ensure voters once again have faith in our electoral process."

View the suit here: 

Michigan: "Organized" effort of The Lincoln Project cited as example of witness, lawyer intimidation in election challenge case

 As brave Americans put their lives, fortune and sacred honor on the line to come forward and give sworn testimony in the legal challenges to the outcome of the Presidential election in Michigan, an emergency motion to seal was filed by the plaintiffs in U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.

Why? Are there examples of threats and intimidation tactics already out in the public domain that would convince a judge to protect the anonymity and physical security of these witnesses?

Yes indeedy there are!

"Three of Plaintiffs witnesses are in reasonable fear of harassment and threats to their physical safety and their livelihoods in retaliation for their coming forward with their testimony...

There was an organized campaign by The Lincoln Project to destroy the business relationships of major law firms with their clients for having the temerity to represent the President of the United States in these (election) controversies."

As Fox News reported on November 13:

Two attorneys representing the Trump campaign's legal battle in Pennsylvania have pulled out of a federal lawsuit filed on behalf of the campaign.

U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann on Friday granted Porter Wright Morris & Arthur attorneys Carolyn McGee's and Ronald Hicks' motion to withdraw from a lawsuit filed Monday alleging "irregularities" affecting the 2020 presidential election.

"Plaintiffs and Porter Wright have reached a mutual agreement that plaintiffs will be best served if Porter Wright withdraws," the motion reads. "Plaintiffs are in the process of retaining and causing other counsel to enter an appearance herein."

The news comes three days after The Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump super PAC that was founded in 2019 by an outspoken group of "Never Trump" Republicans, posted McGee's and Hicks' contact information to their 2.7 million Twitter followers with the message, "Make them famous," along with an emoji depicting a skull and crossbones.

Twitter removed the post for violating its policies against abusive behavior.

The Lincoln Project also instructed Twitter users to create a LinkedIn account for the sole purpose of messaging employees at Porter Wright and Jones Day, another firm representing the Trump campaign in Pennsylvania, to "ask them how they can work for an organization trying to overturn the will of the American people." The account then posted screenshots of messages from users who followed the instructions.

Georgia: Is anyone opening the mail over at the Georgia Secretary of State office?

That's what the lawyers representing President Donald J Trump would sure like to know!

From the press release:

For the fifth time, the Trump Campaign has requested that the Georgia Secretary of State perform an immediate audit of the signatures on all absentee ballot applications and absentee ballot envelopes received for the November 3rd General Election. The Trump Campaign estimates that between 38,250 and 45,626 illegal votes from the absentee ballots alone were cast in the state of Georgia - far beyond the Biden-Harris ticket's current margin of 12,670 votes. 

The Trump Campaign has substantial evidence of other violations of Georgia’s Election Code and numerous other serious discrepancies in voting across the state which call into question the validity of the Secretary of State’s certification of the presidential election.  

Trump Campaign attorneys requested that the Georgia Secretary of State uphold his duty to preserve the legitimacy of his state's elections, saying: "It is not possible for you to accurately certify the results in the presidential race from the November 3, 2020, election until and unless there is a thorough audit of the signatures, which we have now requested four times in writing prior to this request. You cannot in good faith conclude the ongoing statutory recount until you have instituted a signature matching audit," said Ray S. Smith, III, Counsel to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.

“Until the signatures are matched, the vote count in Georgia is a complete fraud,” added former New York City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump, Rudy Giuliani. “There is no way of knowing which ballots are honest and which ballots are fraudulent.”

The New Georgia Project - P... by Yvonne Larsen

When will Kamala Harris resign from her US Senate seat?

Well, when WILL she resign? Two weeks ago County Examiner wrote that Big Media will panic when they learn about the Electoral College Timelines. We suggested watching for signs the states were having difficulty meeting these deadlines.

As the key deadline of December 14 approaches, is the California Democrat Party having a hard time pushing Kamala Harris to resign from her U.S. Senate seat?

Surely the people of California, including Governor Newsom and the Democrat Party of California are on top of this.

Does the Associated Press know the Venezuela elections were "tampered with"?

It sure seems the Associated Press should know. Take a look at the You Tube account --the AP Archive:

(2 Aug 2017) The turnout figures in Venezuela's Constituent Assembly election were "tampered with", the director of a company that provides electoral support services to the country said on Tuesday.

Speaking in London, Antonio Mugica, the CEO and Director of Smartmatic, said the company estimated "the difference between the actual participation and the one announced by the authorities is at least one million votes"

Smartmatic was a company created by Venezuelans in Caracas providing electronic voting machines to the late President Hugo Chavez. In recent years it has branched out to provide the same services to countries across the world, while continuing to provide support for elections in Venezuela.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro called the vote for the constitutional assembly in May after weeks of protests fed by anger at his government over food shortages, triple-digit inflation and high crime.

Many people accuse the ruling party of corruption and mismanagement.

EVIDENCE: Dominion voting software "allows staff to adjust tally"- read the agreement

Public records of Santa Clara County, California published by John Solomon's team at Just The News.com reveal the agreement between the county and Dominion Voting Systems contains a requirement that "allows staff to adjust the tally" of votes.

The agreement also contains a second specification; that "logs all tally adjustments identifying the user making the adjustment..."

From JustTheNews.com

Santa Clara County, California, as part of its agreement with Dominion Voting Systems, stipulates that the company's software must allow county staff "to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."

Evelyn Mendez, the public information officer for the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, said that "the wording [in the contract] is a little weird," but that it refers to a provision meant to ensure that "adjudication" of uncertain votes can occur.

Adjudication, Mendez told Just the News, is used in circumstances such as when there’s a contest in which a single candidate must be chosen yet "someone votes for two." 

"It’s the process of looking at the ballot and determining, 'Did the voter mean to do that'?" she said.  

"If someone puts in a dot instead of a checkmark," she added, "or if they didn’t bubble it the right way, our staff are looking at the ballot and confirming what's correct."

Listen to the first minute of this video where Eric Bolling interviews Sidney Powell-- "The system capability does in fact exist:"

Nevada: How COVID allowed unsigned, unrequested mass mail ballots to be counted in the Clark County election

Yesterday County Examiner reported on an issue disclosed in the Clark County, Nevada lawsuit filed in part by the Nevada GOP and the Donald Trump for President campaign. Specifically the order revealed the ballot-sorting and signature verification systems purchased in the name of "COVID" was acquired to expand the use of mail ballots in the county. 

And in another lawsuit filed in Nevada Case 2:20-cv-02046 is a description of HOW a 79 year-old legally blind plaintiff attempted to vote in Clark County and was not allowed to vote in person because according to election officials, she had already cast a mail ballot. Plaintiff Stokke had not, in fact, cast any such mail ballot.

How did we get here? 

The Nevada state legislature passed  Assembly Bill 4, Sec. 23, in a special session. (UPDATE: Was that special session properly posted with an agenda and opportunity for public to be present?)

The law requires “the clerk or an employee in the office of the clerk shall check the signature used for the mail ballot in accordance with” detailed procedures.

On information and belief and by using the Agilis software system for verifying signatures Defendants violated the Elections Clause by doing an end run around the Nevada Legislature’s constitutional authority to set the manner of elections. 

In particular, by using the Agilis software system instead of matching signatures in person, Defendants have ignored the detailed procedures requirement.

Page 3:

On information and belief, it was Clark County’s use of Agilis signature-verification software that allowed Plaintiff Stokke’s ballot, which she had not signed, to be accepted and counted in the Election.

Further, Defendant Gloria is using the Agilis signature-verification software in a manner which is contrary to the manufacturer’s prescriptions. Specifically, the manufacture requires that signatures be scanned with a resolution of at least 200 D.P.I. Nevertheless, Mr. Gloria has consistently used signature files from the DMV which are all scanned at less than 200 D.P.I., resulting in the Agilis machine being unable to perform its required function (i.e. verifying signatures). 

A motion preventing Defendants from violating Nevada Law and the Elections Clauses and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution was denied on November 6. 

There's more related to the inability of Republican observers to be present during ballot counting at the Clark County Election office.

Are you beginning to get the point of the unrequested mass mailing of ballots? 

Another Nevada Suit by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Ruh roh: Will new docket entries about harrassment of lawyers go unreported by the swamp media?

If you are following news accounts of the Trump lawsuit in the Middle District of Pennsylvania you've read headlines published by the Swampy Media overnight and today along the lines of "Trump campaign pares back lawsuit" and "Trump lawsuit appears to be weakening". 

Note the tactics of the Swampy Lawyers feeding information to Swampy Media. Observe what is OMITTED from Swampy Media articles. Not only does Swampy Media fail to include copies of the legal brief and exhibits, they exclude information that does not align with their prescribed narrative.

New docket entries on file in public records describe motions and responses about harassment of counsel who've committed the political crime of representing the Donald Trump campaign in this litigation. 

PA Middle District: Harassment of Lawyers representing the Trump campaign by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Now what motive could Swampy Lawyers and Swampy Media have for omitting information on folks who encouraged the targeted harassment of lawyers from their "news" stories? 

Yeah. They certainly wouldn't want to report that legal eagles working at a firm representing the PA SOS would do such a thing.

Nevada lawsuit reveals Houston uses same ballot-sorting system as Clark County

Holy Presidential Election, Batman! News organizations across the country are reporting the Trump campaign suffered a huge loss in Nevada; oh really?

Here's a copy of the order from the Clark County, Nevada  lawsuit about the ballot-sorting and signature verification systems purchased in the name of "COVID" to expand the use of mail ballots in the county. 

In his order Judge James Wilson wrote :

Clark County uses an electronic ballot-sorting system, Agilis. No other Nevada county uses Agilis. Some major metropolitan areas including Cook County, Illinois; Salt Lake City, Utah and Houston, Texas use Agilis. Some other Nevada counties use other brands of ballot-sorting systems.

Registrar Gloria decided to purchase Agilis due to the pandemic and the need to more efficiently process ballot signatures. 

One of the Petitioners attorneys questioned Registrar Gloria about Agilis in an earlier case: Corona v Cegavske but never asked Registrar Gloria to stop using Agilis.

Clark County election staff tested Agilis by manually matching signatures. Clark County election staff receives yearly training on signature matching from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The last training was in August 2020.

Judge Wilson Order Clark County Lawsuit by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Related: 

California Gov. Newsom slammed by Superior Court Judge; bars use of COVID to change, make state law

Texas: Harris County Commissioners Court to meet Tuesday; vote canvass on agenda