Monday, November 30, 2020

Georgia: Is anyone opening the mail over at the Georgia Secretary of State office?

That's what the lawyers representing President Donald J Trump would sure like to know!
For the fifth time, the Trump Campaign has requested that the Georgia Secretary of State perform an immediate audit of the signatures on all absentee ballot applications and absentee ballot envelopes received for the November 3rd General Election. The Trump Campaign estimates that between 38,250 and 45,626 illegal votes from the absentee ballots alone were cast in the state of Georgia - far beyond the Biden-Harris ticket's current margin of 12,670 votes. 
The Trump Campaign has substantial evidence of other violations of Georgia’s Election Code and numerous other serious discrepancies in voting across the state which call into question the validity of the Secretary of State’s certification of the presidential election.  
Trump Campaign attorneys requested that the Georgia Secretary of State uphold his duty to preserve the legitimacy of his state's elections, saying: "It is not possible for you to accurately certify the results in the presidential race from the November 3, 2020, election until and unless there is a thorough audit of the signatures, which we have now requested four times in writing prior to this request. You cannot in good faith conclude the ongoing statutory recount until you have instituted a signature matching audit," said Ray S. Smith, III, Counsel to Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.
“Until the signatures are matched, the vote count in Georgia is a complete fraud,” added former New York City Mayor and Personal Attorney to President Trump, Rudy Giuliani. “There is no way of knowing which ballots are honest and which ballots are fraudulent.”

The New Georgia Project - P... by Yvonne Larsen

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Georgia: Stop the destruction of evidence!

 After receiving a favorable ruling (temporary restraining order) on Sunday November 29th from Judge Timothy Batten barring the State of Georgia from wiping or resetting any voting machines in the state of Georgia (TRO here)  renowned attorney Lin Wood just revealed a second temporary restraining order ALSO dated November 29th prevents the impound of voting machine equipment to prevent the wiping of data has been denied.

Can you keep up with all of this? 

In this second order dated November 29, Judge Batten wrote Lin Woods' request to impound fails because the voting equipment  sought for impound is in the possession of county election officials and county election officials are not the named defendants in the suit.

However Judge Battens order requires the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger and Georgia Governor Brian Kemp et al produce a copy of the contract between the State and Dominion Voting Systems "promptly".

Keep in mind that in a letter dated five days earlier (November 24th)  a law firm representing Lin Wood wrote the  Fulton County, Georgia Board of Registration reminding them they are not to repair, alter, maintain or destroy anything on this thirty-six point list ( see spoliation letter).

Item 33 on the thirty-six point list requires the Fulton County Board of registration and Elections produce: 

Any and all communications with any third-party that participated in the election process, including but not limited to:
  • the Department of Justice,
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation,
  • Central Intelligence Agency, 
  • Republican National Committee, 
  • Democratic National Committee, 
  • The Clinton Foundation, any foreign corporations, 
  • and/or any foreign governments

An IN-PERSON hearing will be held Friday December 4.






Wisconsin: Is it legal? Did ZuckerBills pay for a ZuckerElection in Wisconsin?

A group of Wisconsin voters and taxpayers filed suit last week against the Wisconsin Election Commission. The suit, filed in the Wisconsin Supreme Court outlines an extremely troubling account of  how and which Wisconsin State Statutes were violated that allowed their state absentee voter ID laws be ignored in advance of and through Election Day November 3.

The documents also describe how a 501c3 group associated with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg "gifted" in excess of $6.3 million dollars to conduct the Wisconsin general election in the manner determined by the agreement and not in accordance with state law.

Read all the documents; see below for the petition filed by the Wisconsin Voters Alliance and see here for the Democratic National Committee response to the petition. and here for the response of the Wisconsin Election Commission.

WVA WEC Petition by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd


More later....but for now enjoy watching this One America News Network interview with Phil Kline titled "Big Tech: Follow the Money on Election Fraud"



Friday, November 27, 2020

When will Kamala Harris resign from her US Senate seat?

Well, when WILL she resign? Two weeks ago County Examiner wrote that Big Media will panic when they learn about the Electoral College Timelines. We suggested watching for signs the states were having difficulty meeting these deadlines.

As the key deadline of December 14 approaches, is the California Democrat Party having a hard time pushing Kamala Harris to resign from her U.S. Senate seat?

Surely the people of California, including Governor Newsom and the Democrat Party of California are on top of this.



Sunday, November 22, 2020

Does the Associated Press know the Venezuela elections were "tampered with"?

It sure seems the Associated Press should know. Take a look at the You Tube account --the AP Archive:
(2 Aug 2017) The turnout figures in Venezuela's Constituent Assembly election were "tampered with", the director of a company that provides electoral support services to the country said on Tuesday.

Speaking in London, Antonio Mugica, the CEO and Director of Smartmatic, said the company estimated "the difference between the actual participation and the one announced by the authorities is at least one million votes"

Smartmatic was a company created by Venezuelans in Caracas providing electronic voting machines to the late President Hugo Chavez. In recent years it has branched out to provide the same services to countries across the world, while continuing to provide support for elections in Venezuela.

Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro called the vote for the constitutional assembly in May after weeks of protests fed by anger at his government over food shortages, triple-digit inflation and high crime.

Many people accuse the ruling party of corruption and mismanagement.

EVIDENCE: Dominion voting software "allows staff to adjust tally"- read the agreement

Public records of Santa Clara County, California published by John Solomon's team at Just The News.com reveal the agreement between the county and Dominion Voting Systems contains a requirement that "allows staff to adjust the tally" of votes.
The agreement also contains a second specification; that "logs all tally adjustments identifying the user making the adjustment..."
Santa Clara County, California, as part of its agreement with Dominion Voting Systems, stipulates that the company's software must allow county staff "to adjust tally based on review of scanned ballot images."
Evelyn Mendez, the public information officer for the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters, said that "the wording [in the contract] is a little weird," but that it refers to a provision meant to ensure that "adjudication" of uncertain votes can occur.
Adjudication, Mendez told Just the News, is used in circumstances such as when there’s a contest in which a single candidate must be chosen yet "someone votes for two." 
"It’s the process of looking at the ballot and determining, 'Did the voter mean to do that'?" she said.  
"If someone puts in a dot instead of a checkmark," she added, "or if they didn’t bubble it the right way, our staff are looking at the ballot and confirming what's correct."

Listen to the first minute of this video where Eric Bolling interviews Sidney Powell-- "The system capability does in fact exist:"


Friday, November 20, 2020

2009: CA judge ok'd $3 million settlement between state SOS and electronic voting system vendor

In March 2009 a California judge approved a settlement agreement between the California Secretary of State and the electronic voting system vendor sold to and used by five California counties in 2006 -- sold without the authorization of the states' top elections official and in violation of the state election code.

Page 8 of the second amended complaint reveals a troubling account detailing how Elections Systems & Software, Inc. did not have federal certification at the time over 972 AutoMark A200 voting machines were sold and delivered to California election officials for use in their 2006 elections. Also concerning was the machines bore a sticker that indicated the model had been certified by federal inspectors.

It wasn't until July 2007 that ES&S informed the California SOS it had sold 972 units to these five California counties.

ES&S agreed to pay $3,250,000 to the state attorney general on behalf of the California secretary of state in accordance with the agreed upon payment schedule.

Read the two documents below for the details.

California ESS Amended Comp... by Yvonne Larsen

California ESS Suit Stipulated Order by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Michigan: meet the cowardly Wayne County Board of Canvassers UPDATE: Votes to certify rescinded? See the affidavits

All eyes were on Wayne County Commissioners Board of Canvassers Court who convened yesterday to canvass and certify the results of the November 3 election. 

Early media accounts noted the board members voted in a 2-2 tie but then THIS happened:


Bottom line? The two members harassed by fellow board members Aiyash and Staebler caved. Palmer and Hartmann failed in their duty and voted under duress.

Amid the lawsuits; the missing thumb drives and machine "glitches", ballot drop-box video and a Michigan Court of claims order that was not final- Wayne County Board of Canvassers voted 4-0 to certify the results (under oath! ) of the November 3 general election.

They will be written into the history books as four of the most cowardly elected officials you've ever read about.

UPDATE: The two Republican Board members rescind their votes. Read the affidavits here.

Tuesday, November 17, 2020

Georgia GOP undermining America and the Rule of Law

Here's the latest on the ---ahem, "hand recount" underway in Georgia. Lin Wood filed an amended complaint in federal court alleging the recount is a sham and Trump campaign monitors have been denied meaningful access to the recounting process.

As you read the amended complaint note the allegation of one monitor who was instructed to arrive at the ballot counting location on Sunday November 15 between 8 and 9am (she arrived at 9am) only to learn the hand recount occurred November 14, the day prior.
But wait, there's more !

Go to Page 23 of the amended complaint for another allegation that despite public statements by Georgia SOS the recount would be a "hand recount" in reality it's a machine recount.


If there's anyone who knows that making false allegations can backfire, recall Lin Wood successfully represented Richard Jewell and Nick Sandman.

Monday, November 16, 2020

Nevada: How COVID allowed unsigned, unrequested mass mail ballots to be counted in the Clark County election

Yesterday County Examiner reported on an issue disclosed in the Clark County, Nevada lawsuit filed in part by the Nevada GOP and the Donald Trump for President campaign. Specifically the order revealed the ballot-sorting and signature verification systems purchased in the name of "COVID" was acquired to expand the use of mail ballots in the county. 

And in another lawsuit filed in Nevada Case 2:20-cv-02046 is a description of HOW a 79 year-old legally blind plaintiff attempted to vote in Clark County and was not allowed to vote in person because according to election officials, she had already cast a mail ballot. Plaintiff Stokke had not, in fact, cast any such mail ballot.

How did we get here? 

The Nevada state legislature passed  Assembly Bill 4, Sec. 23, in a special session. (UPDATE: Was that special session properly posted with an agenda and opportunity for public to be present?)

The law requires “the clerk or an employee in the office of the clerk shall check the signature used for the mail ballot in accordance with” detailed procedures.

On information and belief and by using the Agilis software system for verifying signatures Defendants violated the Elections Clause by doing an end run around the Nevada Legislature’s constitutional authority to set the manner of elections. 

In particular, by using the Agilis software system instead of matching signatures in person, Defendants have ignored the detailed procedures requirement.

Page 3:
On information and belief, it was Clark County’s use of Agilis signature-verification software that allowed Plaintiff Stokke’s ballot, which she had not signed, to be accepted and counted in the Election.

Further, Defendant Gloria is using the Agilis signature-verification software in a manner which is contrary to the manufacturer’s prescriptions. Specifically, the manufacture requires that signatures be scanned with a resolution of at least 200 D.P.I. Nevertheless, Mr. Gloria has consistently used signature files from the DMV which are all scanned at less than 200 D.P.I., resulting in the Agilis machine being unable to perform its required function (i.e. verifying signatures). 

motion preventing Defendants from violating Nevada Law and the Elections Clauses and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution was denied on November 6. 

There's more related to the inability of Republican observers to be present during ballot counting at the Clark County Election office.

Are you beginning to get the point of the unrequested mass mailing of ballots? 

Another Nevada Suit by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Ruh roh: Will new docket entries about harrassment of lawyers go unreported by the swamp media?

If you are following news accounts of the Trump lawsuit in the Middle District of Pennsylvania you've read headlines published by the Swampy Media overnight and today along the lines of "Trump campaign pares back lawsuit" and "Trump lawsuit appears to be weakening". 

Note the tactics of the Swampy Lawyers feeding information to Swampy Media. Observe what is OMITTED from Swampy Media articles. Not only does Swampy Media fail to include copies of the legal brief and exhibits, they exclude information that does not align with their prescribed narrative.

New docket entries on file in public records describe motions and responses about harassment of counsel who've committed the political crime of representing the Donald Trump campaign in this litigation. 






PA Middle District: Harassment of Lawyers representing the Trump campaign by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd


Now what motive could Swampy Lawyers and Swampy Media have for omitting information on folks who encouraged the targeted harassment of lawyers from their "news" stories? 

Yeah. They certainly wouldn't want to report that legal eagles working at a firm representing the PA SOS would do such a thing.


Sunday, November 15, 2020

Nevada lawsuit reveals Houston uses same ballot-sorting system as Clark County

Holy Presidential Election, Batman! News organizations across the country are reporting the Trump campaign suffered a huge loss in Nevada; oh really?

Here's a copy of the order from the Clark County, Nevada  lawsuit about the ballot-sorting and signature verification systems purchased in the name of "COVID" to expand the use of mail ballots in the county. 

In his order Judge James Wilson wrote :

Clark County uses an electronic ballot-sorting system, Agilis. No other Nevada county uses Agilis. Some major metropolitan areas including Cook County, Illinois; Salt Lake City, Utah and Houston, Texas use Agilis. Some other Nevada counties use other brands of ballot-sorting systems.

Registrar Gloria decided to purchase Agilis due to the pandemic and the need to more efficiently process ballot signatures. 

One of the Petitioners attorneys questioned Registrar Gloria about Agilis in an earlier case: Corona v Cegavske but never asked Registrar Gloria to stop using Agilis.

Clark County election staff tested Agilis by manually matching signatures. Clark County election staff receives yearly training on signature matching from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The last training was in August 2020.

Judge Wilson Order Clark County Lawsuit by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd


Related: 

California Gov. Newsom slammed by Superior Court Judge; bars use of COVID to change, make state law


President Trump tweets video: Dominion CEO "we do have components in products that come from China"

 Yesterday President Trump tweeted CSPAN video of Dominion Voting Systems CEO appearing before a House Sub Committee on 2020 Election Security:












 

California Gov. Newsom slammed by Superior Court Judge; bars use of COVID to change, make state law

Another big win for the Rule of Law and this time it's about California. You've read the news accounts; now read the court decision that Big Media and their Lazy Reporters don't want you to know about.

In her Statement of Decision California Superior Court Judge Sarah Heckman wrote Governor Gavin Newsom is barred from using "COVID" as an excuse to use the California Emergency Services Act to make new or change California state law.

California Superior Court Sutter County by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd


Do you see the path to a President Trump victory now? Connect the dots, California is in play. 



















Saturday, November 14, 2020

Florida: Important dates and activities on the 2020 Elections calendar

 Key milestones aligned to the 2020 Electoral College Timelines are right around the corner. Seven activities take place in Florida between Sunday November 15 and Wednesday November 18.

Sunday November 15 by noon: county canvassing boards to submit Official Results to the Department of State for the General Election.

Sunday November 15: supervisors file with the Department of State a copy of, or an export file from, the results database of the county’s voting system.

Sunday November 15:  county canvassing boards submit reports on the conduct of the General Election to the Division of Elections.

Sunday November 15: county canvassing boards to begin publicly noticed audit of the voting system for the General Election unless manual recount undertaken pursuant to §102.166, F.S.

Tuesday November 17: Elections Canvassing Commission meets to certify Official Results for federal, state, and multicounty offices.

Tuesday November 17: The Department of State certifies as elected the presidential electors of the candidates for President and Vice-President and preparation of Certificate of Ascertainment.

Wednesday November 18: Last day for Supervisors of Elections to prepare and upload daily electronic files of vote-by-mail ballot request information to the Department of State for the Primary Election and General Election.

See Florida Department of State Elections and Activities calendar here.



Texas: Harris County Commissioners Court to meet Tuesday; vote canvass on agenda

Harris County, Texas Commissioners Court will hold a special meeting Tuesday November 17 to discuss the canvassing of votes cast in the 2020 General Election and Special Elections.

Texas Election Code requires the Secretary of State to post a notice on the secretary of state's Internet website of the date, hour, and place of the state canvass at least 72 hours before the Governor conducts the state canvass.

Sec. 67.012. TIME FOR CANVASS BY GOVERNOR. (a) The governor shall conduct the state canvass at the time set by the secretary of state...

Fort Bend County Commissioners Court met Tuesday November 10 to canvass election results.

Governor Abbott must conduct the state canvass on or before December 3, 2020.

* This article was updated to include information about the Fort Bend County canvass.



MORE EVIDENCE: Lin Wood files lawsuit to halt Georgia certification of election

Well, well now.

Renowned American attorney Lin Wood filed a lawsuit in federal court which seeks to prevent the Georgia Secretary of State from certifying the results of the 2020 general election across the entire state.

Wood, who represented security guard Richard Jewell accused in the Centennial Park Olympic Games bombing in 1996, included a copy of the now infamous "consent decree" as an exhibit. It turns out Swampy DC lawyer Marc Elias of Perkins Coie ( as in Fusion GPS and the phony Steele Dossier) was allowed to participate in the lawsuit of which the consent decree was the outcome.

That case was styled Democratic Party of Georgia, et al. v. Raffensperger, et al., Civil Action File No. 1:19-cv-5028-WMR (the “Lawsuit”).

Prior reporting by County Examiner about the key Electoral College Timeline included a link to the vote certification deadline in the Georgia Election Code . 

Friday November 20, 2020 is the date the Georgia Secretary of State shall certify the votes.

As you read the complaint note the similarity to the suit filed in the United States Supreme Court.

The date, time and manner of conducting an election is determined by the state legislature.

Not a Secretary of State.

Not a rogue Governor nor an activist State Supreme Court (think Pennsylvania)

Lin Wood Complaint and Exhibit by Yvonne Larsen on Scribd

Friday, November 13, 2020

Judge denies plaintiff effort to block Michigan vote certification; watch for the media spin UPDATE: GOP state senators chime in

Earlier today Michigan Judge Timothy Kenny denied a legal effort to block the states vote certification. Big Media and Swampy lawyers count on the possibility you do not have access to these documents. This is why I publish them for you when other news sites lack the courage to do so.

Watch for the "spin" from voices this is a loss for President Trump and sound gleeful about a loss for the Trump campaign. .

On the contrary when you read the opinion you'll notice the plaintiffs who filed the action (case 20-014-780-AW; Third Judicial Court of Michigan) are Costantino and McCall, NOT the Trump campaign.

The two plaintiffs now have a legal document from Judge Timothy Kenny describing the Michigan election process as unwieldy, the wishes of the people expressed through their state legislature must prevail and cannot be changed at the whim of a judge through judicial fiat.


"it would be an unprecedented exercise of judicial activism for this court to stop the certification process of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. The Court cannot defy a legislatively crafted process, substitute its judgement for the legislature and appoint an independent auditor  because of an unwieldy process. 

In addition to being an unwarranted intrusion on the authority of the legislature, such an audit would require the rest of the County and State to wait on the results. Remedies are provided to the Plaintiffs. Any unhappiness with MCL 168.31a (a results audit passed by the state legislature) calls for legislative action rather than judicial intervention.

Plaintiffs can go to the Wayne County Board of Canvassers. If they are dissatisfied with the results Plaintiffs can avail themselves of the legal remedy of a recount and a Secretary of State audit pursuant to MCL168.31a"

Here's the best part. See the highlighted portion about attending the October 29th walk-through of the TCF Center.


















This is not a final order and does not close the case.

Remember the letter County Examiner shared yesterday? 

Hmmm. Judge Kenny wagged his finger at the Plaintiffs for not attending the October 29 TCF walk-through. What was Clerk Winfrey's response to the letter below. Can you connect the dots yet?






















UPDATE: GOP State Senators from Michigan chimed in requesting the full audit be completed before the election results are certified.

Video: Jordan Sekulow on where things stand now

Many, many thanks to all the new readers of County Examiner across the country! 

Where do things stand NOW? That's the question I'm asked by friends and family. Watch and listen to this easy six minute Newsmax TV interview of Jordan Sekulow explaining "wait until we file in court"! 

Read the legal filings; the exhibits.

Sekulow also comments on a recent big win for America and the Rule of Law, as he encourages America First to keep the faith.

Watch and listen as former US Attorney Joe diGenova and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Victoria Toensing call out Mitt Romney's reckless rhetoric.


Thursday, November 12, 2020

FLASHBACK: Trump EO allowed for seizure of assets should foreign actors meddle in our election

In September 2018 President Donald J Trump issued and signed an executive order allowing for the seizure of US-based assets of foreign actors should it be determined certain foreign actors meddled in a United States election.

The executive order also required the Director of National Intelligence ( in coordination with the cabinet departments below) to compile an assessment of the possible who, what, where, when and how and deliver it to President Trump, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security....

45 days after the November 2018 election.


Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it.

(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a)...






Trump Michigan lawsuit exhibit: "Zoom" is not a adequate public test of the accuracy of voting machines

Yesterday the Donald J Trump campaign issued a press release announcing the filing of a lawsuit in Federal court; in the Western District of Michigan. PACER (Case 1:20-cv-01083) 

The case is styled Donald J. Trump for President et al v Benson et al and there is a related case in another court;  1:20-CV-522. The suit seeks to stop certification of Michigan election results.

UPDATED Nov 12: two new docket entries in PACER. One indicates the case 1:20-CV-522 is not related and the second reflects Case 1:20-cv-01083 is assigned to Judge Janet Neff.





The defendants are:
  1. Jocelyn Benson, in her official capacity as Michigan Secretary of State
  2. The Michigan Board of State Canvassers
  3. Wayne County, MI, and
  4. Wayne County Board of County Canvassers
On October 28th, 6 days prior to Election Day and the day BEFORE public testing of voting machies and a walk-through of the TCF were to take place, a representative of the Trump campaign Michigan Election Day Operations wrote the following letter to the City of Detroit Clerk:

Ask yourself what was the justification for conducting the voting machine accuracy test via Zoom on October 29, when an IN-Person walk through of the TCF Center the same day was A-OK?

COVID?

Remember: the " Swampy lawyers" keep screaming there's no evidence!"

Shall we wait for the response from the City of Detroit Clerk and see what THEY had to say?





 




American Thinker: PA uses Dominion Voting Systems and sends their data to who exactly?

The undisputed public record and information in the public domain is the state of Pennsylvania (and a LOT of other states) use Dominion Voting Systems (see here). Fox Business host Lou Dobbs interviewed a former Dominion employee (see here) on his show last night.

Dominion makes money via a revenue stream of taxpayer dollars from states, counties who buy Dominion Voting Systems equipment, you gotta wonder what is done with all that election data?

Is it THEIRS to SELL to anyone?
" Pennsylvania uses Dominion voting systems, which forward their data to Edison Research, which then Javascript-encodes it and sends it on to the New York Times and the networks.  So "Pede" downloaded the Edison data for Pennsylvania from the New York Times at this address and analyzed it to locate all similar vote switches, as well as for votes that just went missing." 




In addition to the NY Times look who ELSE uses Edison Research to feed and create the Electoral College map published on their website.












County Examiner will continue doing the work Big Media refuses to do. Think like Big Tech--what do they DO with the data?